Learn / Portfolio construction

Back to learn

Answer page / portfolio construction

Topic cluster / Market neutral and hedging

How should you size the hedge leg in a pair trade?

Learn how traders size the offsetting leg of a pair trade and why hedge sizing is really a risk-budget decision.

Reviewed by Alphora Research

Updated June 30, 2026

What to remember

  • Dollar neutral for simple, highly similar legs
  • Beta neutral for benchmark-driven exposure
  • Vol neutral when one leg is structurally faster
  • Scenario based when the relationship is nonlinear or tied to an event

Start with the hedge objective

The correct size depends on what you are trying to neutralize. If the goal is broad beta removal, the hedge should be sized against benchmark sensitivity. If the goal is to soften event-driven tape noise, scenario sizing may matter more than a historical regression.

The common sizing approaches

Most hedge sizing methods are just different ways of translating risk into notional.

  • Dollar neutral for simple, highly similar legs
  • Beta neutral for benchmark-driven exposure
  • Vol neutral when one leg is structurally faster
  • Scenario based when the relationship is nonlinear or tied to an event

Costs and liquidity still set the boundary

A theoretically perfect hedge ratio is not useful if the hedge leg is expensive to trade, hard to rebalance, or likely to move the book. The practical size is always the theoretical size filtered through execution reality.

Why the size cannot stay on autopilot

Hedge size drifts as volatility changes, event probability moves, or one leg becomes more sensitive than the other. That is why sizing and rebalancing belong in the same research loop instead of being treated as separate implementation chores.